Index / Business / What Is The Difference Between Good Leadership And Good Management
What Is The Difference Between Good Leadership And Good Management
This free essay What Is The Difference Between Good Leadership And Good Management
. If you do not find your term paper, you can search our essay database for other topics on the search page essays.
13 December 2009
Words: 1051 | Pages: 5
Difference between Good Leadership and Good Management.
Do you want to be led or to be managed? Being led indicate that you are willingly being led by a leader whereas being managed, you are being told what to do and usually not willingly. Warren G. Bennis says â€œManagers do thing right; leaders do the right thingâ€ I believe this saying is correct because what a Manager does is to complete whatever it is set for he or she to be accomplished and follow the company policy closely. A manager will only need to complete the task set therefore only â€œdoing the task rightâ€ regardless of how his or her subordinates feel. Whereas a leader will influence his or her subordinates with his idea before making the right decision. My definition of Management is making the most efficient use of human, physical and financial resources to achieve given objectives; involves planning, monitoring, coordinating and reviewing activities. This would be what a manager would have to go through when given and objective to achieve. The definition of Leadership is to influencing others to achieving desired aims and objectives; leaders set the agenda that managers follow. Ideally, a manager who is also a leader is everyone who wants to follow but it is hard to have both in life.
â€œLeadership is only a facet of good management.â€ (1). The role of leadership: to provide inspiration, create opportunities, energize people, and make key choices. We need to understand that there are two kinds of leaders: strategic and operational. A strategic leader can predict the companyâ€™s future and to invest the resources necessary to create it. Operational leaderâ€™s job is to implementing the vision. Although, there are two different leaders, but there are only four things that it takes to become a Good Leader. They are: selecting talent, motivating people, coaching, and building trust. A good leader should not be afraid of subordinates that are more knowledgeable or talented then him or her as these subordinate helps to get a task done well. A Good leader should be able to designate responsibilities to the right person. When the responsibilities are designated correctly, it could motivate people, as those responsibilities are meaningful to them. With the combination of intrinsic motivation with extrinsic rewards and recognition, it can produce highly motivated people. If you want people to cooperate, reward and recognition is very important, these incentives should reinforce the good behavior needed for the teamâ€™s success.
A good leader should also strengthens motivation and develops competence through coaching. In particular, he or she should knows how to keep his or her subordinates focused, recognizing that unless subordinates keep their eyes on the goals, the tend to drift into paths that are attractive to them which are not essentially best for the business. Good leaders should also be able to fire up people by convincing them that their job is vital for the business to succeed. On one hand, people usually quickly turn off when they feel their work is unnecessary and not appreciated. On the other, they feel motivated even doing simple repetitive work when it is meaningful, like stuffing envelopes for a cause they deeply support.
In this constantly changing world, as new competitors upset plans, technological breakthroughs force rethinking strategy therefore it is hard for a good leader to develop trust between subordinates. To overcome this difficulty, good leaders should increase trust by promoting transparency and involvement. Transparency means clarifying reasons for decisions and being open about compensation policy, business results and market information. Knowledgeable workers want to know what the leaders knows about the leader knows about what is coming down the road. They also want a say in decisions they are expected to implement. They want to be sure their views are heard and taken into account. Even when the decisions that are made arenâ€™t the one wanted, they will know they have been heard which increases trust between the leader and subordinates. This way, subordinates would be more loyal and more willingly to follow the leader.
The role of Management: to make things happen and keep work on track; to supervise endless details and engage in complex interactions that are routinely part of any development. Management technique used to be simple. The boss tells his employees what to do, and they complied. No one worried if somebodyâ€™s feeling were hurt along the way. Employees who failed to complete the task were either demoted or fired. These authoritarian managers believe that authority should be obeyed therefore they donâ€™t expect questioning obedience from their subordinates. This is so simple; fear is the motivator that ran the business. When fear runs the business, it can achieve impressive short-term results but long-term consequences can be devastating. This style of management feeds high staff turnover and low employee morale. Low morale will lead a decline in productivity and the quality of service.
Good Management should be very similar to a what a Good Leader does. To be a good manager, should still follow the company policy and should still rationally analyze situations as these helps to be a good manager. Apart from completing and reaching objectives set by the boss, we should also try and motivate the subordinates, as these are the people who helped in completing the task. They should be constantly looking for feedback. They are sensitive to cues within their environment, adapting as appropriate. It is easy for managers to lose touch with their customers and subordinates. To improve this situation, we can make sure that the managers â€˜get their hands dirtyâ€™ on a regular basis. Supermarkets get managers to spend time packing shelves, filling bags and answering customer queries. I believe sitting in an office and making plans is one thing, but actual implementing it is another thing therefore this is good for the managers. To remind them of how shop floors level worked.
To conclude, managing and leading is two very different ways to organize people. Managers are more autocratic and theory X orientated where as Leaders used passion to stir emotions. A manager usually have more knowledge in their field where as leaders may be new but has lots of new and bold ideas that can be benefit to the business. It is common that a leader is followed whereas the manager ruled.