An Analysis of Loyalty in Greek Dramas
By: Artur • Essay • 1,816 Words • January 15, 2010 • 1,302 Views
Join now to read essay An Analysis of Loyalty in Greek Dramas
Murder, corruption in government, religious zealotry, and revenge of scorned lovers are
themes that run rampant through many Greek dramas. However, in the plays Medea, written by
Euripides, and Antigone, written by Sophocles, such themes reach an almost unprecedented
levels. The plays follow women driven to extremes by what she feels is great injustice. The two
women, after whom the plays are named after, fight against the offense and demand respect from
the men they deal with. Antigone stands with her sister, Ismene, against Creon in defense of
giving a proper burial to her slain brother. Medea extracts a horrible revenge against her
husband, Jason, whom has left her for another woman. With all the similarities between the
dramas, there is still one overwhelming theme which surpasses all others; loyalty. The loyalty
depicted is most apparent with the characters’ ties to his/her family and gender.
For the plays, loyalty to one’s family is more than simply familial pride. When Antigone
first faces Creon, she is questioned as to why she disobeyed a creed set forth by the government;
Antigone responds by saying, “It is no shame to pay respect to own flesh and blood” (Sophocles
20). Her response clearly demonstrates the allegiance she feels toward her brother. She further
demonstrates this when she states, “It was no bondman perished, but a brother” (Sophocles 20).
Even in the face of a great authority and with the threat of being exiled or death held over her,
Antigone never questions what she has done to honor her brother. The family fidelity goes
beyond just the brother/sister relationship when Ismene decides to stand beside her sister in
punishment. Though Antigone protests, Ismene attempts to share blame for the burial. To her
there is no life without her sister which she clearly expresses in “How could I live on alone,
without my sister?” (Sophocles 22). Ultimately, it is realized that Ismene did not take part in the
act, the brave support she shows for her sister is truly admirable. Within Medea, Jason attempts
to do what he feels is right for his family. He even tries to justify marrying another woman for
the family’s own sake (Euripides 18). When it becomes clear that Medea and her children will
be exiled, Jason swears that he will not abandon them; “I call the gods to witness that I wish to
help you and the children in every way” (Euripides 20). Despite a situation filled with animosity,
Jason does strive to make the best of the situation at hand. As the play progresses, he discovers
that Medea has murdered his new wife and father. Jason immediately goes to save his children
from the retribution he fears will take place; “So I have come to save the lives of my boys, in
case the royal house harm them while taking vengeance for their mother’s wicked deed”
(Euripides 42). Regardless of how it will look publicly coming to the defense of the
unintentional murderers, Jason will not let his loyalty to his children be swayed. Upon learning
that his children too have died, he becomes enraged. Jason confronts Medea, whom he feels is
responsible for his children’s death; “How you have killed my boys and prevent me from
touching their bodies or giving them burial” (Euripides 46). His grievance is deep, because not
only have many of his loved ones been murdered, but also, he does not understand the injustice
put upon him. The idea that a mother would betray her