EssaysForStudent.com - Free Essays, Term Papers & Book Notes
Search

Hermeneutics: The Philosophy of Interpretation

Page 1 of 7

  HERMENEUTICS: THE PHILOSOPHY OF INTERPRETATION

                

Hermeneuein –to interpret[pic 1]

HERMENEUTICS [pic 2]

                        Hermeneia – interpretation

  • A theory, methodology and praxis of interpretation that is geared towards the recapturing of meaning of a text or a text-analogue, that is temporally or culturally distant or obscured by ideology and false consciousness
  • Presupposes
  • Text and text analogues that are distant in time and culture , or that are blanketed by ideology and false consciousness need to be systematically interpreted under their underlying sense.
  • Main reason why hermeneutics seems to be very complicated idea?
  • Because it has become complex due to the intertwining of its multiple layers of meanings and concerns
  • 3 DIFFERENT LAYERS AND CONCERNS
  1. PRAXIS – w/c is concerned with the actual process of interpreting specific texts
  2. METHODOLOGY – w/c is concerned with the formulation of reliable systems of interpretation
  3. THEORY – w/c is concerned with the epistemological validity and possibility of interpretation

The heightened need for praxis were caused by 2 landmark historical phenomena :

  1. PROTESTANT REFORMATION
  • Spawned whole process of debate regarding Christian’s relationship with the sacred scriptures
  1. RENAISSANCE FASCINATION FOR CLASSICAL ROMAN & GREEK TEXTS
  • Generated a whole arsenal of interpretative methodologies(collectively known as ARS CRITICA)
  • Ars Critica – useful in establishing the authenticity of the texts as well as in reconstructing the text’s most original and correct version.

FRIEDRICH DANIEL ERNST SCHLEIERMACHER

  • Theorized that the primary reason why texts from ancient times were vague and apparently incomplete was because these texts had been removed from their original historical and cultural contexts

  • Believed that texts contain implicit references to their original historical and cultural contexts , such that when they are separated from these contexts, vagueness and incompleteness would necessarily confront the interpreter.
  • PROPOSED 3 RECONSTRUCTIVE STRATEGIES FOR HIS HERMENEUTIC METHOD :
  1. Grammatical Reconstruction –original language and the idiom of the given text are systematically mastered by the interpreter
  1. Historical Reconstruction – historical and cultural contexts of a given text are thoroughly studied by the interpreter
  1. Comparative Reconstruction –given text is studied side by side with its contemporary texts

WILHELM DILTHEY

        

  • German philosopher of culture and epistemologist, Schleiermacher’s biographer and heir.
  • Elaborated on the latter’s idea on the necessity of the cultural ad historical contexts in interpretation.
  • Theorized on the existence of a collective consciousness called the objectiver Geist(objective mind)
  • Solidification of all and every-life expression of a given culture in a given time.
  • objectiver Geist was the ultimate context of all texts and human actions in any given period and place , and understanding it was key for any interpretation.
  • BIG PROBLEM:
  • Schleiermacher’s reconstructive interpretation would logically force any interpreter to regress infinitely towards the past, tracking an endless trail of contexts.
  • Divinatory reconstruction – process through which “one seeks to understand the writer immediately to the point that one transforms oneself into the other.”
  • Proposed another type of reconstruction:
  • Divinatory reconstruction – process through which “one seeks to understand the writer immediately to the point that one transforms oneself into the other.”
  • SIGNIFICANT CONTRIBUTION TO HERMENEUTICS
  • His clarification and elaboration on Schleiermacher’s problematic procedure of divinatory reconstruction.
  • Did this by theorizing on another category:
  • ERLEBNISSE – were experiences vibrating with life, like love, anger, oppression, revolution, beauty, pain, ambition, frustration and friendship.

“Interpretation would be impossible if the expressions of life were totally alien.

  • Believed that the highest form in understanding happens with the reader’s empathic reliving and recreating of the text’s life experiences.

EDMUND HUSSERL

        

  • Believed that a text can reflect its own proper context, making it unnecessary to go outside the parameters of the same text.
  • For him interpretation should start with methodic isolation
  • Process of bracketing – systematic purification of the mind from all the biases and presuppositions before approaching a given text , so that the meaning of the text will not be contaminated by some biases and presuppositions from the interpreter’s mind.

Example: the story of Solomon. we have to understand him in the context of the same old testament contrary of our present day perspective.

Download as (for upgraded members)  txt (10 Kb)   pdf (62.1 Kb)   docx (16.5 Kb)  
Continue for 6 more pages »