Lacoste
By: Top • Research Paper • 1,242 Words • February 6, 2010 • 994 Views
Join now to read essay Lacoste
Introduction
Andaman Tourism Recovery Plan 2005 was developed by Tourism Authority of Thailand in order to manage the Crisis of “Tsunami” Tidal Wave, which mainly caused tremendous damages to 6 southern provinces of Thailand, which are Phuket, Phang Nga, Krabi, Ranong, Satun and Trang. This tidal wave not only affected to local people and thousands of tourists, who lost some of their family members and property in this natural disaster, but also many of tourism investors and service providers such as Hotels and accommodations, restaurants and travel agents lost their property and incomes as well.
Since these 6 southern provinces of Thailand are located on coastal Andaman, they are very famous among tourists both Thai and foreigners for beautiful coasts and unspoiled nature. Each year, these provinces could bring a lot of tourists from everywhere to Thailand. The local people in theses areas earn their living mainly from selling souvenirs and providing tourism services to tourists. Therefore, when “Tsunami” tidal wave unexpectedly attacked and made many of tourists canceled or postponed the trip to Thailand, it causes the opportunity to restore the business and improve condition of living of local people after the Tsunami seem to be hopeless.
Therefore, Andaman Tourism Recovery Plan 2005 will assist all stakeholders to know where Tourism Authority of Thailand is heading to in order to restore and develop these 6 southern provinces.
In this report, we will study and analyze the recovery plan and evaluate the possibility to make all processes success according to the objectives, which Tourism Authority of Thailand set up.
Ms. Ajaree Viwatpinyo I.D. 463 9605
Ms.Naiyana Vongfufeungkajorn I.D.
Objectives
- To study the Andaman recovery plan 2005, developed by TAT.
- To analyze the positive and negative of impact from the recovery plan.
- To analyze the potential effectiveness of the recovery plan.
- To criticize the role of concerned organization in order to create the effectiveness of the plan.
According to the tidal wave disaster “Tsunami” which attacked many countries around Andaman Sea on 26th of December 2004, 6 provinces in southern part of Thailand are one of the victims of this natural disaster. In consequence of “Tsunami”, the situation of tourism in Andaman coastal provinces of Thailand is facing the unexpected crisis. Moreover, the unclear information regarding the situation in affected areas leads to the decrease of number of tourist. For example, the disaster caused many tourists to cancel hotel bookings in Satun, even the province received only slight damage. Many resorts, which had been fully booked by foreigners during the peak season, had received zero bookings since the tidal wave “Tsunami”.
The TAT has been given the responsibility to develop the Andaman tourism recovery plan 2005 in order to restore the tourism situation in 6 provinces affected by tidal wave “Tsunami”, which are Phuket, Phang Nga, Krabi, Trang, Satun, Ranong. These provinces used to be very popular tourism destinations until the unexpected attack of the tidal wave.
Therefore, the Andaman recovery plan 2005 was developed in order to bring back the prosperity in the old days and even re-position and develop these destinations to be more fascinating in the future. The Andaman Recovery Plan 2005 is summarized as follow:
Firstly, TAT divided the plan into 3 phases.
Phase I - 26 of December 2004 until 15 January 2005.
Phase II - is shorterm plan which start from January 15 to March 2005
Phase III - from March 2005 onwards.
Base on Phase I, the affected areas are divided to 3 categorizes as follows;
1. Areas most affected: which at least one-year recovery effort needs to be taken. These areas are Phi Phi in Krabi and the coastal towns of Tai Muang, Khao lak and Tap lamu in Phang Nga.
2. Areas moderately affected: which should take between 3-6 months to recovery. These areas are beach resorts in Phuket: Kata, Karon, Kamara, Nai Yang and Patong.
3. Minimal