Strategic Marketing

Review of Performance: Year 2

By the end of year two Pangea Technologies had achieved great success. Not only did it rank number one in game 5 but it also ranked number one overall. Our management team worked well together and made well informed decisions. We achieved our goal to have at least 40% market share in at least two market segments. In fact, we had 52% market share overall and over 45% market share in every segment.

Decision Aggressiveness

If there was one thing that set us apart from the rest, it would be the aggressiveness of our decisions. By the end of the second quarter of the second year we had opened offices in every available city selling at least one product to every single market segment. We used our resources generously yet wisely in opening offices, and hiring and motivating salespeople, and it paid off.

Financial Performance

In year two Pangea has had an excellent financial performance, net operating profit has grown from $1.4 million in quarter 5 to $45.6 million at the end of the year. Our executive team was also willing to invest a lot in order to gain marketshare as well as profits. Our aggressive investments are demonstrated by the large sums of our operating expenses, which were as follows: $4.9 million when gross margin was $15.3 million in quarter 5; $6.9 million when gross margin was $20.7 million in quarter6; $9.9 million when gross margin was $36 million; $11.9 million when gross margin was $59 million. In addition to these second year expenses, we invested around $9 million dollars in the first two quarters each on research and development. Our executive team believed that these cost were necessary for the growth of our company and it proved to be a good strategy. Our investments were in such things as product improvements, opening sales offices, hiring salespeople, and rewarding and motivating sales people. Another important investment went to creating and revising our ads, and as a result our ad ratings have improved dramatically. We also increased our ad expenses from $700,000 early in the second year to $4.3 million at the end of the year, which increased our ad reach. PangeaЎ¦s investments this year were instrumental in the great financial success of the company. This was demonstrated by the companyЎ¦s financial performance score of 26.95, which is well above that of the average and it is the highest score compared to our competitors.

Market Performance

PangeaЎ¦s executive team was well able to create demand in the primary and secondary market. By the end of year two the company had the largest market share in every one of the five market segments and it also had over 45% in every one of the five market segments. In the Mercedes market, which is on of the two primary markets, the companyЎ¦s market share was 59% at the end of the year. Not only has Pangea reached its goals, but it has gone far beyond it. The reasons for this outcome are many, but the main reason is that Pangea aggressive management was not only good at managing the firm's profitability and marketing activities but also investments in the future. The company has done well in creating brands that satisfied their corresponding market segment, which made it easy to sell to target market. The company used its aggressive approach to open sales offices in all possible areas. Many salespeople were hired to sell PangeaЎ¦s products and the salespeople were well motivated well. Ads helped the potential customers recognize the different brands. Ads also brought in customers to the different sales offices. All of these decisions were important in gaining market share in every market segment. PangeaЎ¦s market performance score of 0.52 also demonstrates its success. This score is an excellent score considering the number of competitors. Pangea received the highest score compare to its competitors. The management team has done well in creating demand in the primary and secondary segments.

Marketing Effectiveness

In year two, PangeaЎ¦s marketing strategy has been very effective in satisfying the needs of the customers as measured by the quality of their brands, and ads. The marketing effectiveness score of 0.87 attests to the success of managementЎ¦s marketing strategy. A good score is one above 0.8. Again PangeaЎ¦s score was the highest compared to its competitors.

Brand Design „І Margins Fixed

Our brand designs were good earlier in the year, but by the end of the year we had the best brand designs in each segment. We focused on designing our brands to the liking of each market segment. We also reviewed our performance as well as our competitorsЎ¦ performance thoroughly, and in the areas where our performance was not the best,