Cloning: A Nusaince or Necessity
By: Victor • Essay • 674 Words • March 5, 2010 • 965 Views
Join now to read essay Cloning: A Nusaince or Necessity
Cloning: A Nuisance or Necessity
So many miraculous discoveries have been made during the last century. Medical technology has advanced at an unprecedented rate. Now, we are faced with yet another scientific breakthrough. Cloning, in recent years has taken its own shape under the spotlight. However, people are debating whether or not it should be done. I mean, “Is it morally correct, humane, possible? How will it affect the future of humanity?” There are those who feel that we should step forward and support the idea. Proponents believe that the technology will be used for the good of mankind. Experts say that the technology may be used to help terminally ill patients in a therapeutic way. Others, however, are trying to stop the practice before it has a chance to realize its true potential because they are afraid of future hazards. They think that someone or some country will use the technology to aid them in war. They do not think that it should be accepted because of many of our religious beliefs. Opponents of cloning believe the benefits could never outweigh the potentially horrid process.
People who promote the idea of cloning claim that it will probably be used for very good reasons. Today’s list of people needing organ transplants because of disease or deformation at birth could be clearly in only a few years. The technology may advance to a point where children born with missing limbs or deformed parts could actually be removed and replaced with a fully functional, completely healthy limb.
If cloning were ever to reach its full potential, the benefits would be virtually limitless. There would be laboratories where the sole purpose of that lab would be to make replicas of one’s self, so that if the person ever had anything wrong with their body, it could be fixed by simply going and having a surgery that would give them a replacement. It would have matching DNA and would be 100% compatible with the body. In theory, people could extend their lives for hundreds of years.
Who can say that cloning is done for the purpose of medicine. Opposers of cloning claim that the technology is not being developed for the safety