The Trial by Franz Kafka as an Autobiography
By: Stenly • Research Paper • 2,157 Words • January 2, 2010 • 1,066 Views
Join now to read essay The Trial by Franz Kafka as an Autobiography
Robert Donlan
Mrs. Fletcher
AP Literature
March 3, 2001
The Trial by Franz Kafka as an Autobiography
Franz Kafka was a very intelligent writer of his times. Kafka was born in Austro-Czechoslovakia. He was mainly a writer of short stories, and complex diaries, yet he did publish a small number of novels. The works of Kafka have been interpreted as allegorical, autobiographical, psychoanalytical, Marxist, religious, existentialist, expressional, and naturalist. His novels have a wide variety of interpretations. Of his novels, The Trial is one of the more complex in aspects of literature (Bryfonski and Hall 288). The Trial was written with the intention of an autobiography for Kafka. The Trial delves into the mind of the victim, K., and also into many things not comprehended by Kafka himself. He wrote this book in order to better convey his questions that he pondered in his head, in search of an answer that was no where to be found, but perhaps in the workings of his fiction novels.
The main character of The Trial is Joseph K. Yet through out the book he is referred to as simply K.. There is no coincidence that Kafka created the character K. as the protagonist of The Trial. The significance was that Kafka was trying to represent himself through the character by giving a close enough name to his without merely stating his own name in the place of the protagonist of the novel. Kafka did this with another one of his characters, and related them to his life in a significant way through the book. For instance Kafka wrote this book at the time where he was engaged to his fiancй Felice Bauer. Another other character in the book, by the name of Fraulein Burstner, is a neighbor of K.. K. has a love for Fraulein Burstner. In Kafka’s manuscripts, and rough drafts for The Trial he refers to Fraulein Burstner as simply F.B., which happens to be the same initials that his future wife had (Brod 170). K. loses touch with Fraulein Burstner early in the book, and through out the book K. want to see her more than anything. K. receives a glimpse of Fraulein Burstner upon a balcony as he walked down the street before he is stabbed to death. Kafka at the time of writing The Trial was deeply in love with his fiancй, Felice Bauer, and wanted to see her more than anything, when he wrote this book he felt a longing to be with her. Yet, the engagement was broken off shortly afterwards. The use of characters in The Trial parallels to Kafka in a literal sense as well as figuratively.
Kafka was a troubled man. He seemed lost in the big world. There were many things he could not comprehend in life. Kafka was a devout Jew. Yet, he did not really understand many of the beliefs, and traditions. A belief, of those practicing some Orthodox Judaism, is the belief in original sin, and predestination. The Trial could be classified as a satire of Judaism, but it’s more likely to just be Kafka’s interpretation upon something that he did not understand in the world. Kafka used K. as his marionette in the book to convey many things that Kafka believed. From the beginning of the book, K. is arrested. K. claims innocence, but is not given a chance to really prove it by any means at any time. He tries acquittal after acquittal, yet nothing seems to change. From the beginning till the end the reader does not know what the crime of K. is. This is Kafka’s way of describing his feelings about original sin to his readers. Kafka did not understand the whole idea that a person can be born with sin upon their soul, so he satirized it in his book. K. is against a power, which he cannot relate to in anyway, and no matter what is done by him his verdict of the trial has already been decided (Wilson 294).
Kafka also brings in other religious ideas, with K., in his search for the answers. K. goes through the book trying to prove himself innocent, but he does not even know the crime of which he has committed. K.’s life is taken over by the courts, and all he begins to do is to search for the answers to help him. This is much like Kafka in his life. Kafka was searching for answers about his religion, but came up with nothing. He was devout, but was never truly moved by any supernatural forces. So K. is just like Kafka that they spend their time in search of something that has no true answer. K. has always followed the rules to what the reader knows (West 298). Yet, this arrest, and summoning of a high court system makes him wonder what rules did he break? It is much like a man in today’s world in search of a deeper meaning in the society that surrounds him, but the search in the novel is fruitless, and is a waste. This is much how Kafka felt about the