Sexual Harassment

Many companies have instituted formalized sexual harassment policies. Israel Discount Bank, PepsiCo., Mitsui & Co., and Time Warner were questioned regarding their sexual harassment policy. The opening statement of a policy establishes the tone for the rest of the policy, clarifying a company's position on the issue. Three of the above-mentioned companies opened their statements of policy forcefully and definitively, stating that all employees have the right to work in an environment free of sexual harassment. The fourth company, Mitsui & Co., was less explicit, stating that all employees have the right to equal employment opportunities. It later proceeded to state that unlawful employee harassment is prohibited. Within their policies, each of the companies gives their definition of sexual harassment. Israel Discount Bank and PepsiCo.'s definitions were similar, listing repeated sexual flirtation, unwelcome advances, propositions, verbal abuse of a sexual nature, suggestive objects, offensive comments, jokes, or innuendoes as harassment. Time Warner and Mitsui & Co. simply enumerate unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, and verbal or physical contact of a sexual nature under sexual harassment. Each company stresses forbids the threat of job loss due to rejected sexual overtures. They prohibit supervisory staff from threatening or insinuating, either explicitly or implicitly, that any employee's submission to or rejection of sexual advances will, in any way, influence any personnel decisions regarding employees: employment, evaluation, wages, advancement, assigned duties, or compensation. Sexual harassment can only be dealt with if the victim comes forth. The willingness of an employee to be forthcoming is dependent upon the articulated position of a company regarding sexual harassment. PepsiCo.'s zealous opposition to such harassment is clear in their written policy which states, "All employees are STRONGLY URGED and ENCOURAGED to bring such harassment to the attention of their supervisors...". The other three companies were not as strong, in that their