An Analysis of the Structure and Culture of Strategic Mining Solutions in the Context of the External Environment with Respect to Future Challenges and Recommended Changes
By: Tommy • Research Paper • 2,466 Words • December 27, 2009 • 1,533 Views
Join now to read essay An Analysis of the Structure and Culture of Strategic Mining Solutions in the Context of the External Environment with Respect to Future Challenges and Recommended Changes
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Strategic Mining (SM) is capable of converting challenges into opportunities, as evaluated in the context of the company expanding its operations into Africa. The company promotes a participative management style which greatly benefits communication at all levels. The Directors of SMЎ¦s Board are technically and managerially highly skilled and are therefore in a position to manage company resources efficiently and unambiguously.
A co ЎV operative culture exists in the company. This feature is developed from the companyЎ¦s core value principle of integrity. This ideal has been the passport to SMЎ¦s current successes and which will remain the yardstick by which staff measure themselves in a competitive environment. A cultural meltdown is not expected now or in the foreseeable future.
Key challenges that the company will face are:
„« Competitors. An increased competitor base due to the booming resources sector.
„« Clients / Broker. Corruption, nepotism among African resource brokering agents.
„« Economic down ЎV swing. Sudden collapse / market adjustment to certain metals markets.
„« Political uncertainty. Local and African leadership under the spotlight. Will the mining protocol continue to unravel itself and will this incomplete model be co ЎV opted by our African partners.
In its current form, SM has a flat structure which is Service orientated. This structure is in a state of evolution and is now adapting the style of a Matrix ЎV type structure. This structure will need to be revamped in order to meet the challenges of tomorrow. Personal agendas and power ЎV mongering might see the polarization of subsidiary companies. To this end, a Hedral model of company structure has been postulated that, hopefully, will render subsidiary companies closely intertwined with SM, at least at the technical level. The corporate ethos of the Group of Companies will still remain that of integrity.
Changes in the external environment are inevitable, it is a dynamic and on going process, and the structure of SM will accordingly realign itself to benefit from those changes. The internal environment is robust and adaptable, thanks to a strong management team that encourages staff involvement in growing the business.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2
1 INTRODUCTION 4
2 THE STRUCTURE & CULTURE OF STRATEGIC MINING 5
2.1 Analysis of Structure and the External Environment 5
2.1.1 New competitors 5
2.1.2 The client as a broker 5
2.1.3 Economic down-swing 9
2.1.4 Political instability 9
2.2 Analysis of the Internal Environment with Culture as a Focus 9
3 AN EVALUATON OF THE STRUCTURE & CULTURE OF STRATEGIC MINING 10
3.1 Generalized Organizational Responses to Change 11
3.1.1 Top Management: 11
3.1.2 Middle Management: 11
3.1.3 Employees/Workers/Associates: 12
4 RECOMMENDATIONS 12
5 CONCLUDING REMARKS 13
6 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 13
7 REFERENCES 14
TABLE OF FIGURES
Figure 1 - Service Structure of Strategic Mining 6
Figure 2 - Matrix Structure of Strategic Mining (Evolving) 7
Figure 3 - Strategic Mining Organogram 8
Figure 4 - Generalised Organizational Responses to Change 11
Figure 5 - The Hedral Model 13
1. INTRODUCTION
A mineral resource should not lie dormant in the ground; instead it should be extracted and beneficiated and the resultant commodity sold to create wealth. This sequence of events - what we mining people refer to as the Ў§mining value chainЎЁ ЎV is a complex fabric of interlocking disciplines that eventually culminates in the winning