Policy of Barrack Obama
By: Tasha • Essay • 1,937 Words • January 9, 2010 • 883 Views
Join now to read essay Policy of Barrack Obama
When one speaks of the economy they should speak of it as if it were an animate object. An economy may healthy, productive or efficient. Likewise, an economy may be weak, slow or inefficient. The question is how do we know how to classify our economy? GNP -GROSS NATIONAL PRODUCT. Economists have devised numerous statistics designed to ascertain the overall health of our economy. Historically, the most quoted measure of economic activity is what is called Gross National Product (GNP). The Gross National Product (GNP) is a nation's total output of goods and services produced BY a country in one year. In obtaining the value of the GNP, only the final value of a product is counted (e.g. homes but not the construction materials they were built with). The three major components of GNP are consumer purchases, government spending, private investment and exports.
The Gross Domestic Product (GDP) is the monetary value of all goods and services performed in a nation in one year. GDP measures the economic strength of a nation. It is computed by multiplying the quantity of all goods and services by its price. When this is done for all three categories, Consumer spending, Government Spending and Investments, the results are added to give us the GDP. In the last several years GDP has gained favor as a more accurate barometer of the state of the economy. With growing globalization our economy is increasingly reliant on goods we produce beyond our national borders. While GNP does not calculate this, GDP does. Though the GDP and GNP are the most widely used system of determining a nation's economic performance, they are certainly not perfect. There are certain factors within the economy that keep the GDP and GNP from being the most reliable measurements.
The first factors are reporting delays. Because the reporting process on a nation's monetary flow is so difficult to document, GDP estimates are made quarterly. The figures are then revised for months after that, so it takes a while to discover how the economy actually performed. Thus there is a disparity between the actual GDP and the reported GDP.
The second factor is the composition of output. Generally, increases in the GDP insinuate that people had jobs and earned an income. However, the GDP alone does not tell the composition of the output. An increase in a certain amount of dollars may not mean that there was more output by laborers, but that the government undertook production of lets say, a certain weapon. A decline in GDP implies that the country is not doing as well as it was before. Yet this does not always hold true, because the decline could indicate a positive innovation such as a reduction in the number of car batteries produced because a new one entered the market that lasts for twice as long.
The third factor is quality of life. The GDP, while it measures the production of a nation, has little to say about the state in which the citizens are living. For example, a new housing project may be built, but if its construction or location interferes with the surrounding wildlife, then the value of the homes could be viewed differently.
The fourth factor is the exclusion of non market activities. Non market activities are those activities that do not take place in the market, and most of them are not accounted for because of measurement problems. Such activities include services people provide for themselves like home maintenance, and the service homemakers provide.
The fifth and final factor encompasses illegal activities. The GDP also excludes many goods and services because they're illicit. These include gambling, smuggling, prostitution, drugs, and counterfeiting. These activities as well as some legal ones that are not disclosed because of tax reasons, is part of what is called the underground economy.
The main purpose of any economic indicator is to measure economic growth from one year to another. The problem with this is that inflation creates what may be referred to as "phantom" economic growth. Total production may remain stagnant one year but if there is a three percent inflation rate it would appear as if production (GNP or GDP) went up three percent. In order to deal with the problem of skewed or inflated statistics economists have developed a formula for factoring out inflation.
What economists do is choose a "base year" and convert the statistic to that base year. Currently we use $1982 dollars as the base year. The Real or constant GNP is all GNP data converted to $1982 dollars. This allows us to compare one year to the next without the influence of inflation in the statistic. In a few years we will most likely adopt a new base year. The reality is that if we do not factor out inflation GNP and GDP is much higher then it should be. In the real or constant GNP figure