Security Versus Privacy: Does Terrorism Change the Debate?

The events of September 11th have dramatically affected the way that Americans view their right to “privacy”, and the level of government access to private information needed to protect all citizens from future terrorist attacks. Though the right to “individual privacy” is not explicitly stated in the Constitution, it does specifically state the rights of the government (Browne, May 2003). There are two different thoughts on the issue and they are divided along the lines of those who want to live in a secure environment and those who want to live in a free environment. A happy medium can exist between the two factions; however, there will never be a secure society that grants all individual liberties. Terrorist attacks have promulgated several initiatives to improve the U.S. government’s ability to identify and track the movements of potential criminals that live within its borders. The fear that Americans have that they may experience another atrocious act of cowardice has forced them to evaluate whether some of our rights to “privacy” hinder their ability to protect themselves. Therefore, many citizens are more willing to give up certain freedoms when “terrorism” becomes part of the debate. As a result, millions of dollars have been spent since 2001 to launch surveillance satellites, improve eavesdropping technology, and create massive databases that gather personal information and create records on citizens in hopes of locating criminals before they strike. There are individuals