Athletics

The debate over big time college athletics versus academics can easily be broken down with facts. Athletes at colleges where athletics are a large part of the school's namesake are given unfair advantages that overshadow the purpose of the institutions existence.

Scandals in college athletics constantly riddle the news and media. Athletes are receiving financial and material gifts to attend and stay at a certain school. They are being given excessive and undeserved grade changes to maintain athletic eligibility. They are getting extra tutors that write the papers instead of teaching. These actions are demeaning academic establishments where athletics are suppose to be extra curricular to the educational priority.

To begin with, division one athletic programs are allowed by the NCAA to provide athletic scholarships to high school athletes. These scholarships permit students to attend universities who very often have not reached the scholastic accolades to attend the specific institution; it is purely their athletic abilities that allow these people to not only study at these schools but attend at a discounted tuition or free of charge. Academic scholarships that work in the same fashion as the athletic scholarships further the goal of the university, to create academic community of excellence; athletic scholarship ignore this goal. Although the scholarships could be used to supplement the goal by awarding athletic scholarships to students who meet the academic admissions but also excess in athletic, this is not being practiced.

The students that were accepted solely on athletic abilities additionally counteract the university purpose by occupying valuable student spaces of enrollment. At Penn State University in 2004-2005, the university had 489 student athletes on athletic scholarship (PSU). That represents 489 student spots that are lost due to the school's dedication to athletics. This translates to 489 students that are permitted to attend the university without ascertaining the minimum academic standards for acceptance that all other students must reach. This bias that profits the athletically gifted should not be occurring at an institution of the highest level of learning.

Not only are the institutions awarding discounted or free enrollment to people that do not meet the required academic achievements, but at times the universities have gone out of their way to use unethical and NCAA rule breaking methods to try to entice these athletes to attend.

The best example of this type of situation occurred at the University of Colorado. The scandal at the University of Colorado dates back to 1997. It started when a seventeen year old high school student accused a football player of rape after recruiting party. Although no charges where filed, three women since then have sued the school. They state that the University of Colorado aided in creating an environment that let to their rapes by football players and recruits. Mary Keenan, the Boulder County prosecutor for the case, declined to press charges; however she stated that she believes the athletic department persuades recruits with sex and alcohol. This trend does not stop there. A former player admitted to taking a recruit to strip club while a former recruiting aide also admitted using a school cell phone to call an escort service for his personal use. Former University of Colorado quarterback Bobby Pesavento said that recruits are treated differently than other prospective students, "You're kind of put on a pedestal and people notice who you are," (College town grapples with recruiting scandal).

One of the largest and most infamous student athlete scandals involved the "Fab Five" at the University of Michigan. The scandal centers on Ed Martin, a former University of Michigan booster. A federal investigation revealed that he had given a total of $616,000.00 to four Michigan basketball players and their families. Martin has said he gave Chris Webber and his family $280,000.00 in cash and gifts while in high school and college. He also stated that he gave Robert Traylor $160,000.00, Maurice Taylor $105,000.00, and Louis Bullock $71,000.00. These paydays resulted in serious repercussions for the University. First, the University of Michigan had to forfeit all of the victories in which those for players played in after the point that Ed Martin became a representative of the program. This includes the 1992 Final Four games against Cincinnati and Duke, in addition to the entire 1992-1993, 1995-1996, 1996-1997, 1997-1998, and 1998-1999 seasons. Secondly, the university must repay the NCAA about $450,000.00 which it received for postseason play with those players. Thirdly, the team was ineligible for the 2003 NCAA and NIT tournaments. Lastly, the basketball program was put on a two year probation period, (Michigan imposes sanctions, including '03