Calvin Vs. Arminius
By: David • Essay • 1,958 Words • November 17, 2009 • 1,205 Views
Essay title: Calvin Vs. Arminius
I-Search
Phillip Plager
Period 4
I have attended Spirit of Hope United Methodist Church for all of my life. One day following communion I noticed a trend. We always used Welch’s grape juice for our communion. Why was that? Was that just always the cheapest juice? I asked my pastor, I needed answers. It turned out Welch’s was a Methodist company, and the juice itself was made for a non-alcoholic Methodist communion. For some reason I thought that this was so interesting. I then thought to myself “I am sure that our long tradition is ripe with interesting facts. Maybe I should check out this Wesley guy.”
So I started my journey and off to the Methodist library I went. I read a summation of the history of the Methodist church. It was moderately interesting, but not what I was looking for. I decided instead of reading biographical information on Wesley I wanted to hear what he had to say. He was an avid writer and his sermons and magazines are very well documented. This is where another trend was discovered. The name Arminius kept on surfacing. The title of one piece of literature was named “How to make good Armenians”. Later Wesley created the “Arminian magazine”, a periodical devoted to the concepts of Arminius. Interestingly enough, John Wesley never actually quoted Arminius once in any of the issues that bare his own name. So in thinking, “As a Methodist I should to be a good Arminian” I came to the conclusion that I needed to find out who Jacobus Arminius was.
In the paradigm of Newtonian physics, Christianity in America today can be separated into two main theological camps. These camps originated from two great scholars John Calvin and Jacobus (James) Arminius. The two main ideological groups that spawned from these men were Calvinism and Arminianism respectively. Other major theories exist such as the post-modern open theorists, or the new quantum physic philosophy, but do not nearly have the following as Arminians and Calvinists. I decided to refine my search. I was going to find the roots of these camps and then assess where their core ideology played into both my church and my spiritual life.
John Calvin was born in 1509 a French Catholic. He later converted to Presbyterian and served as the great protestant systemizer. He wrote volumes in the “Institute for Christian religion” which laid out a protestant foundation. He spoke often of predestination and preservation of salvation. He was known for using keywords such as “justification and sanctification”. Serving as a church politician, Calvin developed the Presbyterian Church into a democratic style government.
Arminius was born at Oudewater, Utrecht, on October 10, 1560. Armininus studied at the University of Leiden and obtained his doctorate. He became a pastor preaching reformation. Since it was a reformed pastor's custom to preach through a book of the bible, Arminius began with Romans. When he was up to chapter 7 controversy erupted. He maintained that the "wretched man" spoken of there was the pre-Christian person, not the regenerate believer. His theological enemies pronounced him heterodox. They also accused him of "Pelagianism", the heretical notion that the Fall has affected humankind so slightly that we can will ourselves, unaided, into fellowship with God. Arminius responded by writing of 5 major points were his theology differed from Calvin. The Calvinist rebuttal was the 5 points of Calvinism. Today the 5 points are characterized by the acronym T.U.L.I.P. These 5 concepts are where we can establish our protestant roots.
So I went on this “journey” to find out some interesting quarks about the Methodist church. I have learned quite a bit by this point, but I am just not satisfied. So far Phil’s Methodist quest, abridged version, goes follows: Wesley wanted me to be like Arminius, and Arminius didn’t want me to be like Calvin, and Calvin didn’t want me to be catholic. I knew Wesley didn’t want me to be Catholic. I was confident I had a theological mess. It was time to turn to T.U.L.I.P.
Total depravity is the first pedal in the wedge issues of T.U.L.I.P. Arimius argued that humans are not spiritually helpless. That it is through a human’s free will, inspired through God, which they turn to God. Faith is essentially a gift that sinners give to God. *Man gives a contribution towards his salvation. This theory put a lot of accountability on man. This would give you a strong reason to evangelize. In this ideology Jesus died for all of humankind, with all humans having the potential to reach the Kingdom of God. Calvin’s objection to this theory was that it takes away from God’s sovereignty. He believed that humans were inherently corrupt, and they did not have free choice to pull themselves from