Cross Cutural Management
By: Kevin • Essay • 1,220 Words • December 4, 2009 • 1,138 Views
Essay title: Cross Cutural Management
Introduction
Nowadays, more and more companies are going globalisation. The world has become one large market for those companies do global business. Companies which are going to do global business or already became an international business company must face their competitors from other countries. Because of this, business of the whole world is getting more competitive. Therefore, a good performance and image are very important for companies to going globalisation because good reputation can influence the customers not only from the local but other countries as well. So to get a good reputation, companies need to build a famous brand in order to make their products “well-known”. Most of the time, build a good public image is also required for there companies to get famous. Some ambitious companies do more such as social responsibility to build their reputation. I believe nowadays, a successful company must go globalisation to extend their business, and the above conditions are required to be done if their want to successful in other countries and all these tasks has to be done by management. So apparently, I’m not agreed with this sentence- “Management’s only responsibility is to maximise profits by operating the business in the best interests of the stockholders”. Although this is one of the most important responsibilities, but not the only one.
Body
As we know, social responsibility has become a very important way for companies to build their good image. Social responsibility is an ethical or ideological theory that an entity whether it is a government, corporation, organization or individual has a responsibility to society. This responsibility can be "negative," in that it is a responsibility to refrain from acting (resistance stance) or it can be "positive," meaning there is a responsibility to act(proactive stance). While primarily associated with business and governmental practices, activist groups and local communities can also be associated with social responsibility, not only business or governmental entities.
There is a large inequality in the means and roles of different entities to fulfill their claimed responsibility. This would imply the different entities have different responsibilities, insomuch as states should ensure the civil rights of their citizens, that corporations should respect and encourage the human rights of their employees and that citizens should abide with written laws. But social responsibility can mean more than these examples. Many NGOs accept that their role and the responsibility of their members as citizens are to help improve society by taking a proactive stance in their societal roles. It can also imply that corporations have an implicit obligation to give back to society (such as is claimed as part of corporate social responsibility and/or stakeholder theory).
Social responsibility is voluntary; it is about going above and beyond what is called for by the law (legal responsibility). It involves an idea that it is better to be proactive toward a problem rather than reactive to a problem. Social responsibility means eliminating corrupt, irresponsible or unethical behavior that might bring harm to the community, its people, or the environment before the behavior happens.
In today’s society a business must maintain ethical principles in order to be successful. (Kaliski, 2001) Businesses can use ethical decision making to strengthen their businesses in three main ways. The first way is to use their ethical decision making to increase productivity. This can be done through programs that employees feel directly enhance their benefits given by the corporation, like better health care or a better pension program. One thing that all companies must keep in mind is that employees are stakeholders in the business. They have a vested interest in what the company does and how it is run. When the company is perceived to feel that their employees are a valuable asset and the employees feel they are being treated and such, productivity increases.
A second way that businesses can use ethical decision making to strengthen their businesses is by making decisions that affect its health as seen to those stakeholders that are outside of the business environment. (Kaliski, 2001) Customers and Suppliers are two examples of such stakeholders. If we were to look at companies like Johnson & Johnson, their strong sense of responsibility to the public is well known. (Hogue, 2001) In particular, take for instance Johnson & Johnson and the Tylenol scare