Film: Philadelphia, Aids/gay

"No one would take on his case... until one man was willing to take on the system" the tagline for

the film 'Philadelphia.' This already tells us its going to be a film fighting for justice that has been

wrongly treated. Two men who are different one black, one white, one hetrosexual the other

homosexual but does that really make them different? Gay lawyer Andrew Beckett who is unjustly

fired by his firm because he has AIDS. Joe Miller is another lawyer (functioning as the mainstream

-audience surrogate which the director wanted) who reluctantly takes Beckett's case and learns to

overcome his misconceptions about the disease, about those who contract it, and about gay

people in general. In this film its about AIDS a concerning diseses that is around today, sexuality is

the issue in this film. The whole court case should be the main factor that he has AIDS but the issue

including this is his sexuality. There are a lot of homophobic people out there, the word AIDS then

was automatically assume "Oh Gay" he was wrongly justifile because of that, his firm broke the lawyer,

Joe Miller a lawyer whom realize in time that it doesn't matter whether his Gay or not in the AIDS

case but he does have a problem with homosexuals and they way they live, in time he had some

conpassion in the AIDS/Gay issue.

By just watching the film now there must of been a issue with homosexuality and AIDS or

together? This film wasn't made for fun, It was made for a reason, That reason is very important

aswell. It seems media attention associated with HIV/AIDS has had the unintended

consequence of increasing homophobic attitudes. that was the main reason to make

'Philadelphia ' It gave huge awareness of the illness to the masses to the world. -

Futhermore the director Jonathan Demme achieved what he wanted to achieve.

Showed how Important AIDS is, that GAY and AIDS are not always connected. He created Joe

Miller as a main steem viewer that would watch Philadelphia. Basically Joe Miller was the

audience who watched the film. He knew hardly nothing about AIDS as when he first found out,

Andrew had AIDS he took steps back and was watching everything he touched. After that

specially he found out more about AIDS like people watching the film, so they will have

some compassion to, like Miller got when he found out more about AIDS and worked with

Beckett. As the director wanted it to be main steem the audience specialty will be mostly.

Philadelphia is going through a jounrey Andrew Beckett being a live, going through AIDS

treatments, suffering, dying. Him dying shows it better to be protected during sex.

It is interesting that Andrew beckett, watching him, it feels like you know him or even if you

didn't know anyone with AIDS Philadelphia ables you to feel as If you know somebody

with the disease, in form of the lead character.

Andrew Beckett seems like any other man in the beginning of the film. One of those people

you would get on with, that always look on the Positive side of things (like he did on the

phone to his mum even though he got bad news at the hospital.) Right at the beginning,

when you first see Beckett is at the meeting with Miller debating and he wins, means

he's good and he strong. His job is a lawyer a powerful, constructive, high level, respected

job that you would think homosexuals work for in the homophobic eye. When he comes

back from his treatment he heading for his office his employes that are woman