EssaysForStudent.com - Free Essays, Term Papers & Book Notes
Search

Ge Talent Machine : The Making of a Ceo

By:   •  Essay  •  836 Words  •  November 11, 2009  •  1,664 Views

Page 1 of 4

Essay title: Ge Talent Machine : The Making of a Ceo

GE’s Talent Machine : The Making of a CEO

________________________________________

Founded in 1878 by Thomas Edison, General Electric is nowadays a leading business in electrical generation, distribution and use in America and in the world. The company has been experimenting successful business models since its creation, and its human resources policy has been considered for a century one of the most sophisticated. It consists in a strong focus on human potential through executive development to the top ranks of the firm: this performance based meritocracy has made GE a “CEO factory” for the company and for all corporate America. In 2001, Jeff Immelt, the company’s new leader was faced with the problem of how to keep this talent machine humming.

________________________________________

In the last half of the 20th century, four CEOS made GE’s HR management one of the most successful in the world. Confronted to a strong diversification (due to World War II), Ralph J. Cordiner (1950-1963) implemented a thorough decentralization of the business decisions, created the first corporate management university and heightened GE’s dialogue with its executives (self-evaluation, performance evaluation, career forecasts, succession plans…). His successor, Fred J. Borch (1963-1972) intensively diversified GE and accompanied the operation with the creation of the Executive Manpower Staff to centralize the high potentials of the company. Reginald H. Jones (1972-1981) first reduced the role of HR in strategic planning but ended up aggregating business groups according to the sector, thus facilitating again the succession plans. John F. Welch, Jr. (1981-2001) restructured GE and based the HR policy on the company’s performance through executive rankings and stock options. He heavily promoted the participation in corporate courses and later extended the company evaluation system to all employees (polls, open dialog…).

The “CEO factory” thus became effective when GE no longer felt the need to compete for business graduates because the company had become attractive and offered its particular kind of bottom-up, company oriented, meritocracy based career. These cultural changes were accompanied by a shift of performance evaluation towards company’s objectives and values, with a strong intervention of HR experts and a daily performance management (“in GE, it’s not just a focus on people; it’s an obsession”).

________________________________________

Jeffrey R. Immelt is a pure product of this system: he underwent harsh evaluation, corporate courses, career planning and was confronted to economic challenges (in the Appliances, Plastics and Medical Systems businesses). He successfully passed every step of the performance evaluation and was finally picked as the new CEO in 2001, based on his adaptation skills and his attachment to the company’s performance and values. The day after his nomination was the 9/11, but Immelt’s commitment to growth remained intact.

HR were a key factor in his strategy of strengthening the assets of GE,: Immelt aimed at aggregating the engineering talents of GE (to keep a technological leadership), at facilitating the communication (to accelerate the services), at promoting a “passion for

Download as (for upgraded members)  txt (5.6 Kb)   pdf (90.9 Kb)   docx (12.2 Kb)  
Continue for 3 more pages »