Kierkegaard’s Fear and Trembling
By: Mike • Essay • 1,641 Words • November 20, 2009 • 1,584 Views
Essay title: Kierkegaard’s Fear and Trembling
Kierkegaard’s Fear and Trembling
What is a human person? How do human beings relate to God? Who am I? Why do I exist?
I. Soeren Kierkegaard, a famous theologian of the 19th Century, wrote Fear and Trembling in 1843 in response to Hegelianism. Kierkegaard takes on the pseudonymous role of Jonannes de Silentio and speaks on modern peoples’ attitudes toward doubt and faith. He believes humans are creatures entrenched in reason and doubt but not in the same sense as Descartes, a French mathematician, scientist and philosopher. Descartes doubted everything he had ever learned; his way of thinking is called hyperbolic or Cartesian doubt. According to his philosophy, within the world of ideas there is clearance sale; everybody has a shop (their mind) and everything in one’s head is one’s ideas and beliefs. Reaching a point where one doubts everything is not easy to attain, yet humanity, on the whole, believes this is the starting point. Descartes denied himself of many things in order to reach such a state of being. He believed he had knowledge, whilst everyone else had beliefs. A belief only became knowledge when one had reasonable proved it via logical thought. Kierkegaard argued that knowledge is “understandable” whereas faith is “absurd.” This knowledge is useless unless one can make the “leap of faith.” When one is bound by knowledge and rational thinking, he/she is said to embody the universal because one’s individuality is made void for the sake of societal good. On the other hand, the individual characterizes a relationship with oneself in the case of the aesthetic and a relationship with God in the religious. The latter is highest relationship; therefore, humans will receive the most pleasure from it. Most men during Kierkegaard’s time followed Hegelianism; Kierkegaard believed that there were “stages on life’s way”: “the aesthetic, the ethical, and the religious.” Hegel believed everyone should strive to be universal and embody the ethical. The ethical lifestyle is one of selflessness and commitment to the betterment of society. The universal is the enactment of the ethical. Man should strive to do the common good or that which benefits the most people. The ethical encompasses the laws that govern society (e.g. do not murder an innocent person). Although, Kierkegaard recognizes the inherent good in an ethical way of living, he still maintains that the religious should always take precedence. For example, people admire Abraham’s story because very few people would have had enough faith to sacrifice their own son in terms of a religious outlook; with the ethical outlook it would be considered murder. With that in mind, God could ask one to contradict the ethical at anytime. Hence, men of faith, according to Kierkegaard, live a life of fear and trembling. Abraham represents perfectly how human beings should relate to God. The relationship between human beings and God is characterized by blind faith (sola fide). Abraham effaced his worldly understanding to adopt faith. Whether Abraham suffered or not is irrelevant because he did it for God. If God had asked one of us to do what Abraham had done, we would have runaway but he always said, “Here I am.” He was a “knight of faith;” he had completed the stage of infinite resignation and had made the leap of faith into the absurd. What gives him faith is not his movement to the infinite but rather his extra step back to finitude. He symbolizes the spiritual/religious way of life. Humans also relate to God with obedience and reverence. This makes God sound like a despot, because man is forever subject to his will but ultimately a person of faith is a friend of God. Kierkegaard would consider himself more of the aesthetic lifestyle because he is ruled by his feelings and emotions. In fact he calls himself a poet (i.e. a romantic). During humanity’s time of suffering God gave us heroes (e.g. Abraham) and poets (e.g. Kierkegaard). Abraham “was great he believed the absurd;” he left behind the understanding; he did something no on else would dare to do (pg. 50). Poets immortalize heroes such as he. Kierkegaard would also regard himself as a voice of truth in a time where insular Hegelianism was the dominant philosophy. Abraham represents perfectly how human beings should relate to God. Faith is the highest passion of man. When faith is enacted, one has reached the pinnacle of his/her potential. Humans exist to praise and serve God; humans exists to one day achieve faith. Kierkegaard exists for that reason.
II. I sat in my room in Hardey Hall on Newton Campus for forty-five minutes trying to answer the questions in part one (What is a human person? How do human beings relate to God? Who am I? Why do I exist?), which I found very difficult to answer. I never forced myself to answer such difficult questions.