Problem Solution: Usa World Bank
By: Mikki • Research Paper • 2,495 Words • December 21, 2009 • 1,156 Views
Essay title: Problem Solution: Usa World Bank
Problem Solution: USA World Bank
Student Name
University of Phoenix
Problem Solution: USA World Bank
USA World Bank is a major player in the banking industry with a presence domestically and abroad. The bank enjoys success in the consumer arena, as well and the small business arena. USA World Bank has been able to sustain this growth primarily by introducing one new product annually to the marketplace. As the banking company decides which product to launch this year, they are faced with the added pressure of recent performance. According to Brian Allen, President of New Product Development for USA Word Bank, “Our new products have pretty much tanked in the past couple of years. We’re under a lot of pressure to deliver something that will be profitable and increase market share,” (University of Phoenix, 2007). USA World Bank has to the review the proposed product offering, and based on statistical analysis; decide which one will be most beneficial to the organization.
USA Word Bank only launches one new product per year. This selection process is relatively non-standard, as each group has their own means or gathering the data to support their recommended product offering. Brian Allen has the ultimate authority as to which new product is recommended to the Board of Directors. However, he bases his decision heavily on the recommendation of Mary Monroe, Vice President of New Product Development. The Board of Directors has the final approval of which product USA Word Bank goes to market with.
For this year’s product recommendation, there are two groups competing to have their product selected and presented to the Board of Directors: New Product Development and Marketing Development. The New Product Development group is headed by Mary Monroe, and has proposed a consumer credit card. The Marketing Development group is headed by Jim Wilson has proposed a credit card for small businesses.
Each group has done their own independent analysis of the statistical data to support the recommendation of their product. The New Product Development group hired a consulting firm, Best Market Research, to conduct market analysis for feasibility of this product, while the Marketing Development group conducted regional focus groups to gather their data. After review of the two proposed new products, Mary Monroe gave a recommendation to Brian Allen of a new consumer credit card, at the objection of Jim Wilson.
At the board presentation, newly appointed board member Dr. Bea Hansen noted her concerns about the statistical data presented, and the collection methods. Alexis Andrews, Chairman of the Board of USA World Bank adjourned the meeting and has given the senior management team 1 week to clarify the data that they have collected, and their corresponding analysis.
This challenge in front of the New Product Development group offers several opportunities that address both the immediate future as well as the long term. The immediate opportunity for the New Product Development group is to reassess all of the data that was collected and the collection methods. This will determine an accurate picture of what this data truly represents. Working in a collaborative effort with the Marketing Development group, this gives USA World Bank the opportunity to review why only one product goes to market each year, when clearly there are two separate revenue streams that will be directly impacted by this decision. The long term opportunity is to develop a standard method of collecting and analyzing data company-wide, and ensure that the results are reviewed independently as to avoid any personal bias in the decision making process.
There are multiple stakeholders in this scenario, each with their own perspectives, priorities and responsibilities: New Product Development group, Marketing Development group, Board of Directors, consumers, and small businesses.
The New Product Development group has responsibility to annually “develop and launch a product that will have significant impact on earnings,” (University of Phoenix, 2007). The group has not had much success in recent years in the products that have been launched, so they have a vested interest in making sure that the product launched will prove profitable.
The Marketing Development group has responsibility for “building business for the bank,” (University of Phoenix, 2007). This group has a positive track record of performing to that objective and has “increased USA World Bank’s small business segment by 40 percent,” (University of Phoenix, 2007) in the last three years. This groups concern is that if their customer base is not accounted for in the new product developed, the small businesses will start to take their businesses