Public Education for Certain People

Public Education for certain People

Public education was an unfulfilled promise. Pioneers in Canadian education like Egerton Ryerson championed the cause of school for everyone; regardless of gender, ethnicity, or social standing. A noble ideal and to some point perhaps achieved, but participation does not equal success. Schooling in early Canada was not what it is now. It was a time of growth and a new nation’s social development. Like a newborn in the hands of inexperienced parents mistakes were inevitable, unfortunately these mistakes were not recognized by the generation that made them. Canadians in the early 19th century did not allow equal access to schools. Many people were not comfortable with their children sharing classes with other genders and minorities. Those deemed inferior or lower were not given the luxury of choice.

Native children were dealt the cruelest blow. The Canadian government did deliver on their promise to educate all Canadians, in the native Indians case they got more than they asked for. Taken away from their families they were forced to attend church regulated schools (The promise of Schooling Paul Axelrodd pg 72 ). S.Contenta paints a picture of Young native children being swallowed into a hidden curriculum that enforced beliefs in opposition to their ancestral culture (Egerton Ryerson and the hidden curriculum). The destructive hidden curriculum has all but destroyed the native culture to this day. What most Canadians do not realize is that the education that was forced on them, under the premise of helping them to join civilized society, was not in conjunction with public education. Natives despite this being their ancestral land were not allowed to attend school with the dominant white class instead they were taken away to residential schools (Axelrodd pg 73). Since they were not allowed to attend public schools. Native children were educated by the charity of the church (mission school syndrome). As a result the education was not the equivalent of the dominant social class. Public education arrived decades too late.

African descent was enough for a child to be excluded from attending public school (The color line in religion and education Walker pg 3). Many Canadians like me have believed that segregation and racial prejudice was only a part of American education. In fact segregation has a deep and ugly history in Canada. Black children have faced bigotry since they started to attend school; Nova Scotia and Ontario were completely segregated. Black children faced a similar situation to that of natives in that they could not choose where they went to school. Ryerson in an attempt to solve the problem created the 1850 ACT separating the cost of running the schools between the Government and the local community (http://www.victorshepherd.on.ca/Other%20Writings/new_page_1.htm Victor Shepard). Ryerson having successfully made a situation where the government had a say in the schools students’ also added section XIX forcing the community to educate minorities separately, segregation was now legal. Black children needless to say got the short end of the stick (The color line in education Walker pg 110), they were not allowed into Canadian public schools until 1954. Black students have had generations of lower quality education; this education in turn produced people that could not prosper in our society. Most of these people are of direct African descent, their forefathers did not ask to be brought here and they most certainly did not ask to have their children feel the cold climate of segregation.

Women are considered the fairer sex, just not in educational rights. In the 19th century women did not have a position of equality to that of men. They were primarily taught to be homemakers and any education that they received was only in this regard. This obvious stereotype aside they were not even allowed to be in class with men until the late 19th century (Sexism in education Nancy Sheehan pg 334). Girls were in general being schooled at home by a governess (The promise of schooling Paul Axelrodd pg 6) then with the free public schools opening in 1871 girls could finally attend classes with boys. After spending most of the century studying in seclusion and only domestically orientated subjects, girls were finally able to study on a level equivalent to that of boys. Despite being allowed into class, girls were not treated the same during or after there education. Women regardless of their ability did not have equal opportunity in what they could study, or where they could study. They did receive the elusive right to be educated with the dominant majority; they just didn’t have as many choices to what extent they would be educated.

Education was not for the poor. Public schooling was a dream for most of the 19th century, before