The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, by Mark Twain
By: Mike • Research Paper • 1,999 Words • December 15, 2009 • 1,409 Views
Essay title: The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, by Mark Twain
The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, by Mark Twain, is acknowledged to possibly be the utmost book of American literature. Nevertheless, others would oppose of this position. Since the book was published and put on public library shelves, Huck Finn has been criticized by a variety of people with diverse beliefs. According to New York Times, the first library to ban the book was the Concord Public Library Committee, who viewed the book as, “trashy and vicious” on March 16, 1885. The way they viewed the book, the book had been taken off the shelves and now people were to buy it if they wished to read Mark Twain’s novel. In fact, according to Bill Walsh, Twain actually “wrote a letter thanking them” about banning his book. Mark Twain liked how he now was getting his novel so much news exposure and making more money off the ban. However, in our time, the book is still being criticized and many groups such as the NAACP are trying to remove it from school reading lists and other public libraries. In Walsh’s article, “Most objections revolve around the use of the word ‘nigger’.” Their belief is that the novel is teaching racist ideas to readers and black students shouldn’t have to read this kind of book. In addition, Walsh writes that the opposed consider Jim as a “bad stereotype”. This is another view of why people want this book banned. Lastly, Walsh states, “There have been countless attempts to ‘clean-up’ the language in the book.” This was done to only quiet down critics and groups but in the long run the book could not have given its full meaning that Twain wanted to emphasize. As for the meaning, Mark Twain satirizes racism through Jim’s characterization and his interactions with whites throughout the classic novel, The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn.
To embark on, Twain did not mean in any way to teach his readers racist ideas. In fact, he essentially added a notice right before chapter one. The notice says:
Persons attempting to find a motive in this narrative will be prosecuted; persons attempting to find a moral in it will be banished; person attempting to find a plot will be shot.
The author did not really signify this, but rather use satire to actually tell you to find the motive, moral, and plot. He did not want a reader to look at the word “nigger” and not get the meaning. Additionally, an article by Peter Salwen, he tells how “…you can search through all of Twain’s writings...you’ll be hard to find a derogatory remark about the black race.” Now why would you call someone racist or his piece of work racist if he or she has not written or said something that’s belittling to black people? This does not mean he does not speak of black people, in truth according to Salwen, when Twain compares blacks and whites, his comparison are “…not conspicuously flattering to the whites.” Again, how can one be racist if he or she is making remarks that make it seem black people are better than whites if he or she is white themselves? These just prove that Mark Twain is not a racist person and wouldn’t write a racist book. An article called, “Racism in Mark Twain’s Huckleberry Finn,” it tells that “…it’s important to separate the ideas of the author from the ideas of his characters…” This is really telling the reader to read between the lines. The ideas of a character are not the ideas of the author. Mark Twain may pinch his experiences in there but he is not telling readers his ideas but rather he is trying to tell you how the ideas would be like that in that certain time period. Jims journey is actually about “freedom and the quest for freedom” according to Salwen. Jim’s point of the story is being a runaway slave trying to achieve freedom with the help of a little white boy. In the article, “Attack on Racism”, it tells that “blacks were seen as inferior.” This was realism, in the South, white people were superior and Twain wrote realistically. And again from Salwen, he wrote, “…‘nice’ people didn’t consider the death of a black person worth their notice,” and on the topic of the word nigger, “…it would be amazing if they didn’t use that word.” Really in the South, people saw blacks as property not human and they could careless about them. For the word nigger, its how they addressed blacks and Salwen is poking fun that if they didn’t say it, it would be amazing because none of this controversy on Huck Finn would happen. Back in the article it tells, “To say the Twain is racist because of his desire for historical accuracy is absurd” (“Attack on Racism”). This is true, Mark Twain wrote realistically and truthfully. He couldn’t have over rationalized this book.
One of the finest examples of satire found in the novel was in chapter 32 where Aunt Sally asks about the steamboat explosion. It goes as follows:
“Good