The Great Music Debate: Classical Vs. Non-Classical

While is it is true that classical music is more complex, challenging and demanding, the merits of music are not based on rational or irrational/abstract discourse rather it is based on taste. Classical music cannot be listened with the same inattentiveness and distractions as other musical styles because there are many intricate details within classical music that set the ambiance and characters. To appreciate classical music properly you must give it your full attention, as well as some knowledge of musical form and structure. Due to a lack of words, the actions are transfigured in emotions, with the use of notations and chords. For instance, it was believed that specific chords and keys in classical music would arouse different moods based on the sound. Beethoven’s 5th in C Minor, signified loss, coldness, and sorrow. However, it is the beauty within the simplicity of music that makes it that remarkably attractive and catchy.

Some classical music is as immediately compelling as pop, for instance, the first bars of Beethoven’s Fifth being more recognizable than those of Pink Floyd’s Hey You. But on the whole, a symphony is undeniably much more complex and demanding than any Beatles songs such as the Yellow Submarine. A good piece of music should be able to play with one’s anticipation. Although, complexity may make classical music different and more intellectually interesting, it does not necessarily make it more aesthetically pleasing than pop or modern music. In fact, it raises the important question within musical debates of substance as opposed to pleasure to the ear. The feeling you get in your stomach or chest when you’re moved by the music you consider great, whether it’s Mahler or Metallica, stems from the emotion derived in heart not the head. It is obvious that pop music and modern day music does less with their harmonies and melodies than the works of great classical composers.

There are imperative elements