What the Bleep Do I Know?

“What The Bleep Do I Know?”

A few aspects of “What The Bleep Do We Know?” really caught my attention, while a few others made me laugh as I pondered the ability for them to be real. To me, The film as a whole was both effective and ineffective. It was effective because it explained the reasoning behind quantum physics and how our lives are based completely off that. I liked the fact that they went into deep detail on all the aspects they covered. The film was ineffective because it lacked real world, down to earth studies. Come on, changing the physical appearance of water? Highly doubtful. Saying that if you believe you can walk on water, it will happen. This is just a few examples of what made a bit skeptical of the film and its theories.

The film was well organized in a format that the viewer could understand. It was in chronological order, and jumped from explanation to image/example. From a strategic standpoint this worked very well for me. I like how the geniuses of the movie would speak in very technical terms, then show an example of what they were just talking about. It gave the viewer time to let the information soak in, while they watched a theatrical version of what was just explained.

The premise of we create our own reality was very clear throughout the film. It got the point across that if one sets their mind to something, the task is attainable no matter how large the obstacle to overcome may be. All of the needed background information was given through the knowledge shown by the professors, scientists, and quantum theories geeks. Throughout the film there wasn’t really any counter arguments stated expect the fact that people could disagree with the entire thought of quantum theory. They were refuted by actually saying in the film to try what they were saying, and if it didn’t work for you then you criticize the thoughts of them all you