Comparing "girl" and "a&p"
By: Andrew • Essay • 1,246 Words • April 26, 2010 • 1,877 Views
Comparing "girl" and "a&p"
Within every story or poem, there is always an interpretation made by the reader whether right or wrong. In doing so, one must thoughtfully analyze all aspects of the story in order to make the most accurate assessment based on the literary elements the author has used. Compared and contrasted within the two short stories, “Girl” by Jamaica Kincaid, and John Updike’s “A&P,” the literary elements character and theme are made evident. These two elements are prominent in each of the differing stories yet similarities are found through each by studying the elements. The girls’ innocence and naivety as characters act as passages to show something superior, oppression in society shown towards women that is not equally shown towards men.
In each short story the character(s) the author highlights are young girls. This is first evident in the title alone in “Girl” where the title already gives the impression of a universally known stereotype as being young, and naпve. Although the title “A&P” does not suggest the same implication, within the story the reader learns quickly that the girls described in the story are in fact young, and innocent and lacking instruction just as the character in “Girl.” Understanding the characters is important because it sheds light on the reasons why they do what they do, and give reason to the plot. In which case, the characters even become the plot, such as the two short stories referenced. The girls described by Sammy in “A&P,” consume much of the story just by description, making it unmistakable their character. “...And then the third one, that wasn’t quite so tall. She was the queen. She kind of led them...” (Updike). Momentarily the reader is able to develop an image of these girls because everybody, young or old, most probably has been witness to this type of entourage throughout middle/high school. The girl being referred to by Sammy, Queenie, is oblivious to the fact she is stirring up the scene in the store, showing her naivety. Similarly, in “Girl” the fact that the young girl is being given instructions on how to behave as an adolescent girl by her mother, is reason to believe she is so inexperienced that her mother felt the instructions were necessary. The girls both have not realized the expectations society has upon the female population, nor the consequences that come from acting unladylike.
What’s different with the two characters is the mother-daughter relationship. In “Girl,” the mother realizes the possibility her daughter, like any other, could fall victim to act “like the slut you are so bent on becoming,” (Kincaid), where it seems Queenie’s mother, who sent them to the store in the first place, did not show concern when the girls left the house in their bathing suits, Queenie’s straps falling off her shoulders and all. Furthermore, the mother in “Girl” acted as a more dominating figure as the whole story showed to be more of a monologue than a dialogue between the two. The words coming out of her mother’s mouth show that the mother has accepted these rules of behavior in her own life, yet the way in which the author illustrates this shows the girls distaste to all these rules. Both characters although presumably innocent, seem to show tendencies of rebellious nature towards society. In terms of society, the stories take place during different times and places. The character in “Girl” originated in the Caribbean and of poor descent whereas Queenie portrayed a richer class from Boston as affirmed by the author, “...getting sore now that she remembers her place, a place from which the crowd that runs the A&P must look pretty crummy.” These different circumstances could also be attributed to the characters actions. The character in “Girl” shows to be a flat character or one that acts expectedly, and seeing that she came from such a traditional background, one can assume she did was she was told and did so willingly or not because the fact she did not respond to her tyrant of a mother. However with Queenie, her character is shown to be more complex or round. It is unpredictable like the bee she is described as and unexpected such as when Sammy says “Her voice kind of startled me, the way voices do when you see the people first, coming out so flat and dumb yet kind of tony too...” (Updike). Quiet, and mysterious to Sammy and the reader, she then begins to reveal new characteristics that might not have been foreseen.
The underlying themes in each story are ones that communicate