David Jones Vs Meyer
By: joanna198 • Term Paper • 2,623 Words • April 12, 2015 • 917 Views
David Jones Vs Meyer
When asking a native Australian what comes to mind when the word department store
is mentioned, they will immediately reply with either David Jones or Myer. David Jones is a high-
end Australian department store founded in 1838, making it the oldest operating department
store in Australia and one of the oldest in the world, celebrating it’s 175th anniversary as of
March 2013. As a department store, David Jones is associated with luxuriously chic fashion
forward product. Competing with David Jones as a leading Australian department store would
be Myer. As a department store, Myer caters to a less exclusive, yet extremely large
demographic of people looking to receive quality product and customer service at a variety of
different price points. Although both of these department stores have seen a large amount of
profitability, it is evident with global retailers bringing their companies to Australia, business has
been suffering tremendously at David Jones and Myer. In order to save these department
stores, it is imperative that David Jones and Myer take action soon to save their businesses. A
potential solution that could increase profitability as well as conceivably save these retailers is
that David Jones and Myer should merge into one company.
In order to save the business of David Jones and Myer, one potential solution is to have
the companies merge under one umbrella of a company. American company Macy’s Inc., is a
company that functions as one umbrella with Macy’s department store, a successful omni-
channel retailer comparable to Myer and Bloomindale’s, a more luxurious, exclusive department
store comparable to David Jones.
One reason in particular why merging these two retailers under an umbrella of a
company would be a wise decision is that if this is done properly, David Jones and Myer will still
be able to keep up with the modern consumer. Keeping up with the modern consumer is one of
the larger reasons why David Jones and Myer might be suffering as fashion retailers. Modern
consumers are being drawn to fast fashion retailers such as Zara, Top Shop, and H&M due to
the fact that these retailers are able to keep up with what drives a customer to buy, that is, new
innovative ways to shop. It is quite clear that department stores serve an entirely different
purpose than fast fashion retailers, however, that is not to say that they do not have an
obligation to keep up with what the modern consumer wants. An area to look at when trying to
keep up with consumers is to establish a creative product presentation as well as product mix.
David Jones and Myer actually have an advantage to being a department store due to the fact
that they carry a variety of different product for women, men, and children. Therefore, they have
more options and product to be creative with. Many customers have stopped shopping at
department stores due to the fact that it can get quite overwhelming. If David Jones and Myer
were to merge under one umbrella company, David Jones would be able to create a visual
merchandising strategy that is appealing to their higher end customer. Conversely, Myer caters
to a wider variety of customers, so it is possible that they could create a more creative product
presentation that has a bit more edge