EssaysForStudent.com - Free Essays, Term Papers & Book Notes
Search

Discuss Each of the Following Theories of Organisational Design

By:   •  Research Paper  •  4,803 Words  •  May 17, 2010  •  1,438 Views

Page 1 of 20

Discuss Each of the Following Theories of Organisational Design

Question 1: Discuss each of the following theories of organisational design

1.1 Classical Organisational theory

1.2 Neoclassical Organisation Theory.

1.3 Systems Theory

1.1 Classical Organisational Theory.

One of the leading proponents of classical organisation theory was Max Weber a leading German sociologist. Weber ( 1947:7) argued that power is principally exemplified within organisations by the process of control. He further distinguished between authority and power by defining power as any relationship within which one person could impose his will, regardless of any resistance from the other, whereas authority existed when there was a belief in the legitimacy of that power. Weber classified organisations according to the nature of that legitimacy as hereunder;

„X Charismatic authority, which is based on the sacred or outstanding characteristic of the individual.

„X Traditional authority which is essentially a respect for custom

„X Rational legal authority which is based on a code or set of rules.

Rational legal authority developed into the most predominant form of authority of the three. Weber (1947:9) contested that rational legal authority is attained through the most efficient form of organisation, bureaucracy. He further argued that managers should not rule through arbitrary personal whim but by a formal system of rules.

Weber believed that bureaucracy is the most efficient form of an organisation, and based on his ideas concerning the legitimacy of power Weber outlined the characteristics of bureaucracy in its purest form and includes,

„X An organisation having clearly defined and documented set of rules such as a company handbook and other written instruments of company policy.

„X Specialisation which entails division of labour according to functional expertise. In modern times this is the notion of individual departments such as sales, procurement, accounting, administration, information technology etc

„X A clearly defined hierarchy of offices or chain of command which relates to system of supervision based on clear levels of authority.

„X Rules which entails a stable comprehensive system of conduct which can be learned and may require technical qualifications to understand and administer

„X Impersonality, which entails no hated or passion with equality of treatment for all clients of the organisation.

„X Individual advancement based on merit, meaning promotions should go to those who deserve and perform well on the job.

„X Professional managers are required but those that own the company do not necessarily have to posses the expertise needed to keep it running smoothly

Key Criticisms of Classical organisation theory.

Thompson and McHugh (2002:87) argue that the classical theory is essentially prescriptive. The writer agrees with this analysis and further argues that this approach is entirely at variance with modern management thinking which emphasises on empowerment, teamwork and motivated performance

.

1.2 Neoclassical Organisation Theory.

The Neoclassical Organisation theory developed as reaction to the tough authoritarian structure of classical theory. The most serious objections to classical theory are that it created over-conformity and rigidity thus working against creativity, individual growth and motivation. Neoclassical theory emphasised on addressing many of the problems inherent on classical theory. This section will use empirical evidence and theory to discuss Neo-classical theory as regards individual growth, creativity and motivation.

Scientific Management.

Frederic Winslow Taylor (1856-1915) attempted to systematically analyze human behaviour at work by making individuals into the equivalent of machine parts. Just as machine parts were easily interchangeable, cheap and passive, so too should human parts be the same in the machine model of organisations. There was eventual resistance to what some workers considered dehumanisation of work even though studied and encouraged management to study the relationship between work breaks, working hours and productivity.

Howthorne

Download as (for upgraded members)  txt (31.9 Kb)   pdf (379 Kb)   docx (25.2 Kb)  
Continue for 19 more pages »