Ice-Fili

Ice-Fili

Memo

To: Anatoliy Shamanov, CEO

From: Consultant – Temple Consulting

CC: Troy Pappas, CEO – Temple Consulting

Date: April 20, 20082

Re: Strategic Analysis

Executive Summary

We at Temple Consulting have completed an analysis of Ice-Fili’s current corporate standing using data collected over the past several years. Using tools such as Porter’s Approach and SWOT we have analyzed the internal and external environments and have recommended several strategic plans of action. Current areas for improvement such as marketing initiatives and re-evaluation of distribution channels will increase sales and profitability almost instantly. Long term plans such as lobbying against luxury tax on ice cream, partnerships with franchise vendors, and bringing new products to the market, performing an IPO, and planning more global efforts will help keep Ice-Fili rooted as the industry leader in Russian ice cream production for years to come.

1. Internal Analysis using SWOT

Strengths and Weaknesses

Ice cream in Russia is a very profitable business. Profit margins range between 15 and 20 %. This profit can be even greater when creating a premium product. Ice-Fili’s product value lies within raw material acquisition. Since the content of fat applied in the creation of ice cream is higher in Russian ice cream, the product is of better taste quality and unique flavor. With the Russian public placing more alarm on preservatives in edibles rather than fat content, this gives Ice-Fili an advantage over foreign competitors. In fact, Ice-Fili was the only ice cream producer awarded at the 2002 Moscow World Food exhibition for its brand Eralash. To market such prestige could help increase brand loyalty amongst customers. Ice-Fili also enjoys rather favorable brand recognition. The