Lab Report Projectile Motion
By: Sylvia Tan • Lab Report • 778 Words • March 22, 2015 • 1,410 Views
Lab Report Projectile Motion
- Purpose
To observe, analyze and compare the theoretical calculations data and actual measurements data of projectile motion.
- Hypothesis
The displacement value of theoretical calculation is higher than the actual measurement. Due to the air resistance and friction reduced the value of displacement.
- Materials
- A car board
- A marble
- Rulers
- A Photogate (BeeSPIV)
- Two Nelson Physics 12 Textbooks
- An iPhone 6
- A card board box
- Method
- Put the car board box on the desk.
- Put one side of the board on the box, another side on the desk directly.
- Put the Photogate at the end of the board.
- Put the ruler on the floor, which is perpendicular to the desk.
- Measure the height of the desk (from the floor) by using the ruler for totally 3 times and determine the average value of the heights measured.
- Measure the height of the top of the board (from the surface of the desk).
- Release the marble on the top of the board and make it be able to go through the Photogate.
- Use the iPhone 6 (slow-motion) to film the process of falling.
- Check the video and find out the location of landing (actual horizontal displacements).
- Check the speed of the marble (when the marble is leaving the end of the board) that shows on the Photogate.
- Record these two data and reset the Photogate.
- Repeat the step 6 to step 11 for totally 3 times.
- Add a textbook between the box and the board.
- Repeat the step 6 to step 11 for totally 3 times.
- Add one more textbook and measure the new height of the textbooks.
- Repeat the step 6 to step 11 for totally 3 times.
- Calculate and determine the average speed and the average actual horizontal displacement of each group of data.
- Calculate and determine the theoretical horizontal displacement by using the height of the desk and the speed of the marble when it is leaving the board.
- Compare the actual horizontal displacement theoretical horizontal displacement and analyze the factors that may cause the difference.
- Make the conclusion.
- Observation
Table height:(1)0.92m (2)0.924m (3)0.923m
Average table height:m[pic 1]
Ramp height (none textbook): (1) 0.132m (2) 0.131m (3) 0.132m
Average ramp height:m[pic 2]
Ramp height (add one textbook): (1) 0.168m (2) 0.17m (3) 0.163m
Average ramp height:m[pic 3]
Ramp height (add two textbooks): (1) 0.198m (2) 0.195m (3) 0.197m
Average ramp height:m[pic 4]
Ramp Height (m) | Desk height (m) | Launch velocity (m/s) | Experimental |
Horizontal displacement | |||
(m) | |||
| |||
0.1317 | 0.9223 | 1.19 | 0.462 |
0.1317 | 0.9223 | 1.2 | 0.465 |
0.1317 | 0.9223 | 1.21 | 0.458 |
0.167 | 0.9223 | 1.37 | 0.57 |
0.167 | 0.9223 | 1.36 | 0.563 |
0.167 | 0.9223 | 1.37 | 0.573 |
0.1967 | 0.9223 | 1.54 | 0.633 |
0.1967 | 0.9223 | 1.52 | 0.64 |
0.1967 | 0.9223 | 1.57 | 0.643 |
Calculation
1.caculate the time
D=[pic 5]
D=[pic 6]
H[pic 7]