Motivation (fmc Green River & Aberdeen)
By: Anna • Essay • 1,972 Words • March 14, 2010 • 1,260 Views
Motivation (fmc Green River & Aberdeen)
In this Individual Project we will discuss the issues of FMC Green River focusing on Employee Motivation, along with Job Design and Goal Setting, Performance Appraisal, Pay and Career Development. This analysis has been requested to be continued by Mr. Kenneth Dailey with FMC Green River.
FMC is and has been a successful company for the last fifty-six years. First originated in 1948 and produced 1.3 million tons of various grades of soda ash a year. The success of the first business brought about a second refining plant in 1953, which was completed in 1970. FMC Aberdeen, located in South Dakota with a population of 30,000 is also a successful subsidy of FMC. FMC Aberdeen employs one hundred people, produces one product, which is a missile canister for the U.S. Navy. FMC Green River managed by Mr. Dailey, produces various chemicals, has over 100 domestic and international customers, 1,150 employees, creates several products and works closely at times with the United Steel Workers of America. Aberdeen has a great structure for the ability to create quickly various small work teams such as informal groups or self managed work teams that allow the group to focus on improving a specific process. At Aberdeen the small groups gather, choose their own leader, poll together ideas and come up with a solution to specific problem. Once a solution is found the team disbands. Since Aberdeen’s company is smaller and its employees create a family atmosphere, the role relationships between the people in the groups have a strong personal bond. This basic idea will also work at FMC Green River but will require some modifications. At Green River, if they follow the same concept, then the small groups that gather to solve a specific problem must also remember that what effects one decision in the process they are improving may have a devastating impact on another division of the same company since the company produces different products. Quickly creating teams on the spot for resolutions to specific problems as done at Aberdeen is much easier when only dealing with one product for one customer. At FMC Green River, where there are several products being produced and over 1,150 employees, trying to incorporate small teams when the need arises will work but some restrictions may have to be applied. I would suspect more division of labor and command groups would be better suited due to the possible impact of a decision by one team, which may significantly influence another part of the organization.
At FMC Aberdeen the Job Design was very simple. The plant manager had a staff of four: a quality and engineering manager, a purchasing manager, a production manager, and an administration manager. None had a secretary. One office technician answered the phones and greeted people at the front door. Aberdeen is a family type operation and everyone knows everyone. The total working is around 100 employees. Whereas at FMC Green River Ken Dailey has been there since 1948, he has a total of around 1,150 employees. (Clawson, 2005)
At FMC Aberdeen the reward structure was referred to. “Those who were referred to as technicians and were paid on salary basis. Those who were production technicians were also paid overtime for any hours worked beyond 40 per week. There were no annual bonuses, no profit-sharing plans, no-stock-option plans. A team member described one reward the teams had in addition to salary: If workers can keep four or five factors, including productivity, sick time, our downtime, and out absenteeism, at a certain rate, we get a day off around the 4th of July.” (Clawson, 2006. page 11). At FMC Green River force earning $18.00 per hour are the highest paid among all FMC employees.
My recommendations to FMC Green River pertaining to job design is the process of linking specific tasks to specific jobs and deciding what techniques, equipment, and procedures should be used to perform those tasks (George & Jones, 2005, p. 203). All new and existing miners will receive 3 day safety training before going back to their jobs. Mining is a dangerous job; therefore it’s imperative that safety is stressed on the job. The job will require miners to be a minimum of 21 years old. Before new hires with no experience can go into the mine they will have to have gone through three months of extensive training and pass the qualifications test. Employees that are hired with experience must have at least five years experience and have gone through safety classes before beginning work in the mine. All applicants regardless of experience would have to pass the safety and qualifications test. A drug test and physical abilities test will be performed before training would begin. There should be a drug tolerance policies put into place and those who fail should not be considered for employment. All employees are subject to random drug testing. At Aberdeen, Bob Lancaster hired a consultant to