Of Power and Good & Evil

Of Power and Good & Evil

There was never something so desirable than want before man existed. I should rephrase; there was never anything so wrong as the desirable man before he existed. Desire itself was and is the key to living a life. Necessity was not and is not and it will be shown that it is the key to only existing. Desire and want is a form not of existence but of living from existence, whereas man cannot be debased any more than his mere existence. There is existence of things and that is the start of everything or the base for everything. There are plants and flowers and animals as voracious as human beings who exist but furthermore they live with their desires. The necessity of one thing is alongside the start of existence. Necessity is, yet, somehow something of difference amongst others, because what is necessary for one living thing is not necessary for another. This necessity or necessities do not go beyond the nature of that being, so necessity is thus proven again to be alongside existence. When necessity differs amongst us and it does truly, as can be seen by the necessity for water of human thirst as not being the same necessity as the water well, nor is fire’s necessity of oxygen the same as the tree’s necessity of carbon dioxide, the idea of necessity is not singular. There is no other form other than the fact that necessity means what is needed. So, then it must be true, that necessity is in fact interpretation and nothing more than that.

The idea of necessity is a matter of perspective and an idea which is its only relation to desire. Desire is an innate feature of any living being. Any living thing desires something in some language and in some way, that maybe we as humans do not understand, but this is true. Now the argument may be that desire does not come naturally, and that its arousal is from the purpose of mind and conscience, which may be true. If I did not think that i wanted something, would I still want it? There is a point of interesting coalescing now with the mind, body, and soul and the process of desire within the three cells should be explained as much as it should be. The mind would think of a singular thought describing emotion. This is under the assumption of singularity within the mind and emotion, but dualistically, the mind would be affected by the emotional ‘thought’ and then the message would be inscribed. As the action of this message for desire takes place, there is also a calling of the body. There are some things the body needs and there is a thin line between the mind and body in terms of what the body needs and what the body wants. The body is not a thinking thing, but there are actions within the anatomy of the human body, for example, such as the involuntary action of the esophagus that the body does on its own. Then there is a desire for food, and this is called hunger, but hunger is in fact a necessity of energy which would mean that the mind affects the body in so much as the brain controls the body. Although, I believe it can be generally stated that the body always wants to be good in some sense, and there are things such as white blood or red blood cells that operate on the body’s behalf and can be seen in the blood-brain barrier as being separate from the brain and the nervous system. The brain controls emotion and the mind affects the brain as much as our perception of the world, which is the great difference. As the mind holds the key for desire, there is a point where the body is forced upon the mind to take under this desire and is controlled physically by the mind and/or brain. The only question now is if this desire or this message is of good or of bad, and it is commonly associated in this world, on a sidenote, that what is necessary is in fact not bad but not exactly viewed upon or questioned about its goodness or how good this necessity is.

There is some principle of desire, where something always seems to be first sacrificed as something is gained second. This loss is not really of material, but it is of the soul. The soul was born with tragedy and comedy, with desires and pain and disappointment but these can be explained to a certain point I believe. The soul is of immaterial, so anything else I say of the subject may be immorally untruthful and horribly extrapolated by my mind and conceptions. It is impossible to be able to show the world the soul for what it truly was. The soul in this ensuing example can be imagined as some image or picture. This exact picture cannot be shown to the world for it only exists within a body or mind with more depth, and so there is a question of transference. The soul, or this picture, or this picture being as a picture or this soul being as a soul has a perk or attribute which I believe to be a gift to the world; this soul can be imitated. Imitation is transference, and