What Is Always at Stake When Communicating?

Introduction

What is always at stake when communicating? (Levinas stuff)

In the past dozen years, a renewed emphasis has been placed on the importance of the public sphere and the necessity of open discussion in a participatory democracy. Putnam’s Bowling Alone in 2000 quantitatively demonstrated a quarter century of decline in civic participation by citizens in the United States. Putnam grounded his work in social capital theory and emphasized that vibrant, functioning social networks are necessary for democratic society. While much credit, deservedly, goes to Putnam for focusing national attention on the decline of communities and other social groups, it is important to recognize the role communication as a discipline plays in this national discussion, as well as the effort in the Communication Studies department at the University of Northern Iowa to prepare students for a lifetime of civic participation.

Communication scholars have long been knowledgeable of the intricate relationship between communication and community. In fact, it is through the act of sharing information that we are able to form a group or community. Although community has always played an important role in the study of communication, it seemed as if focus on the community took a secondary role to more specific areas of inquiry, such as interpersonal relationships, group interaction, or organizational