Is Managing Diversity Unethical

Abstract

Imagine that you are a highly qualified former Hispanic executive who was recently laid off from a fortune 500 hundred company. With in that company you held several key roles in which you were crucial to the success of the organization. In the prior roles you may have never really understood the need or the process of managing diversity. You hold several advanced degrees in key business fields despite all of your experience education and the economy flourishing you can’t seem to find a job comparable to were you were. You happen to buy a copy of the Wall Street Journal and on the front page is the article below:

Hispanics are the nation's largest minority group, and the youngest, and the most underrepresented in companies' top management.

Since 1990 the Hispanic population has grown from 22.4 million to nearly 42.6 million. By 2050 they'll account for one out of four U.S. citizens. But of the 10,417 board seats in Fortune 1,000 companies, they hold only 191, and occupy just a scant 1.1% of the executive offices in those companies. Of the top 1,000 corporations, 913 have no Latino officers, and 35 entire industries, like insurance and telecommunications, have no Hispanics at all in executive positions. Search firms say their databases are rich with Latino talent. LatPro, the largest job board for Hispanics, has a database of 240,000 professionals, with 50,000 candidates seeking entry level management positions -- the same $50,000 to $100,000 a year positions companies say they're having trouble filling with diverse professionals. Says Ernesto Fresquez of Fresquez & Associates, an Oakland staffing firm, "I could fill every professional position in a major corporation, from entry level to CEO, with highly qualified, educated and experienced Hispanic candidates." But the demand just hasn't been there. One problem, says this article, is that companies may not be aware of these resources; another may be that they're unwilling to face how far behind they are in Hispanic hiring. (Thomas 2003)

Introduction

When the society’s functioning of diversity and social responsibility fails, the results are a system of inequality and lacking of social commitment. Diversity concerns are relevant and essential human ideas in which making choices is not always a matter of ethics or black and white. Managing diversity does not always presuppose management’s moral or social conscience as the primary concern. The following plans would help management and working class alike distinguish which position we must take in regards to managing diversity and social responsibilities. Currently today Corporate America faces a formable obstacle. This challenge will force those in positions of leadership to perform a serious organizational gut check. As the face of the consumer and employee rapidly change the result is an over whelming need for the ability to manage diversity and value differences while maintaining ethical standard. Performing this gut check will help leadership evaluate their ability to be successful in the near future.

Thirty years ago discrimination and was a part of normal business activity. Work place diversity meant hire outside of your family not outside of your race. As a result, the federal government felt impelled to create employment laws. These new laws were implemented to eliminate discrimination and provide the means for advancement. As a consequence of this implementation, these laws have created possible barriers to maximizing the potential of every employee (Chan, 2000). Within the last 10 years the growth rate of the labor force has slowed, resulting in increased immigration to both the United States and Canada. During the same period, the source of new immigrants has also changed, with the growth in the number of immigrants coming from Asia, Africa, and South America outpacing that of European immigrants. While this trend has provided a greater supply of skills and abilities from different parts of the world and from different segments of the population, it has also increased the need to harmonize the resulting differences within organizations.

Recently, the concept of diversity has completely changed from before. The previous process of handling diversity entailed expecting people to assimilate to the new cultures. They were forced to adapt to fit the mold of company's dominant culture. The new process treats diversity as an asset. Actually, good diversity management does not require employees to assimilate. It encourages them to develop their strengths and present innovative ideas ("Managing Diversity", 1999). Managing diversity is not about treating everyone the same. It is about recognizing and accommodating differences, and making sure that those differences do