Love and Nutrition
Love and Nutrition
He says, "I love you”. She responds,” I love you too”. Now, heterogeneity and socialization of cultural emotions follow constructing a decisive maze of scorch trials. If ‘he’ is the self who becomes the measure of service propaganda, then ‘she’ becomes the victim of a psychological extortion of return values; in other words, ‘she’ enhances the victimization of the service-return propaganda and constructed expectations. The instrumentalized conscious beginning of the self or distorted ‘en-masse’ becomes the soon to-be theory in return for cultural premises. Politically, ‘he’ urges for a dictatorial supremacy over his opposite fallen consciousness(sex). Hypnosis of ‘her’ mirage of fulfilled virtues adds up to the hysteria effect on her mind. ‘She’ craves for the absolute order of things, now. ‘He’ is selflessly ‘self’ in the decision making body of the malice government. The economical power of knowledge is a boosting mechanism for snapping a few unconscious traits of human mind. And the fornication of ‘his’ id-ego-super ego venture becomes a topic in oblivion. The medical gaze of the relationship between ‘him’ and ‘her’ becomes a response to dominant ideological superstitions. The knowledge of unreserved response from ‘his’ sexual partner is hidden beneath the psychic-power equilibrium which offers a catalyst of perverted catharsis. The pandemonium offered by polluted catharsis occurs as a culturally-dominant knowledgeable phenomenon. The basic structure of ‘his-her’ ideological intimacy resulting in a paradigm of both glocal and global euphoria has hardly been put forward to question. And if so, the author of the ecological bonding has been put to bed with an indomitable excuse of hearing out the madness of civilization.
We all suffer from the economics of 'love' as a collective whole accounting for instrumentalized delight: suppression of the self through a theory of cultural stratification and exclusivism or to generalize the suffer-relish strata of language, self-medicate our gullible sexual anxiety with conspicuous machismo. The power of structured programming of 'love' with reference to gender prospects about 'love' is a cultivation in sarcasm. The re-identification of knowledge-power discourse about the defined prospect and its simultaneous direct absence of objective correlatives' (established hierarchies and discursive conventions) is an ambitiously 'magic' gaze. The torpid equation between equality and equity concerning the remote abstractions about 'love' is an absolute cultured phenomenon regardless of the plethora of stable sexualized propaganda. The focus on objective types of innovation and expansion into the received recesses of conventionalised knowledge is an extravaganza in return. The circus of tension between strengths and pedestrian attitudes towards the monotonous definition about the discourse of 'love' is politically and socially suffocating. The colonial mortification of the id-ego-super ego game is a practised stream of discourse which occurs as a result of stereotyped part-object idiosyncrasies: inauthentic and killing in its grandiosity.
‘He’ asks a definite question:”Do you trust me?” with an astounding naiveté and continues ‘his’ search for an infinite masculine response. ‘He’ hopes for an eureka which informs time of the mental machinery of the uncalled passive strangulation - religion of love and her hegemonic attire. The psychic gaze envelops a stream of appreciation and imperial reward - gift of the magic of blunt comprehension. We momentarily pause on the love’s return of favor notion. The House of Commons decide a particular anti-clock pattern and an interstellar voyage of paradox which we can relate to the systematic cultural hoax and relativity of knowledge-science theory. ‘Her’ anti-slavery attitudes become a recovering proposition for demanding warm antics as she moves away from her innate consciousness-recovery methods to awaken ‘his’ void. ‘She’ becomes a goddess of her own vision, a bloodcurdling memory of a tot recovering from toxic malady and hysteria. Hysteria can become the symbol for bliss with de-colorization taking place at the command of ‘his’. ‘He’ is used to dictate the laws of nature, but, finds out social constructivity to be flooded with mental or moral escapades: an unending search for masculinity and status before ‘her’. Heteronormativity gets published as the box office episode in finding geographical balance in intimacy and gender-power relations.
Gender identity proves to be a giddy topic in performance and establishment, then. Gender performance can provide a division of unconsciousness and helps to suffer from the pangs of determination and bourgeois constructivity. Gender identity cannot be established as an independent discourse but a gradual stigmatized cultivation in return for infectious performance and loss of identity. ‘His’ origin of identity is an enigma in definition: the earlier suspicion of public forms of learning to an instrumental appropriation by the self of that learning for the purpose of self-cultivation. ‘She’ reflects identity crisis and loss of color; ‘she’ suffers from a healthy dose of schizophrenia as waiting for the ‘complete other’ becomes the undisputed answer. The reflected other of ‘his’ examines heteronormativity as the ultimate genuine scope for reconstructing globalized redemption with an affinity for a strange reversal of order: the vast theme of love’s language as supported by his dominant self. The advertisement of a peculiar kind of not-so traditional cultural epoch involving masochism and sado-masochism takes up as an excuse for the silent reversal of order, or to become an active voice in 'her' existential capacity. An easy situation arrives obviously where the dominant discourse feels lighter than the moral perversions when ‘he’ blocks ‘she’ or, to take the matter to court, hits on the podium of knowledge to strike off the mental judge. The corporate sector arrives on time and points out the established canon, or the definition of love, suggesting the subjective exposure of psychic corruption and her affinity towards the pedestrian measures of seduction. The euthanasia motivation follows thereafter and the issue of 'love' becomes a laissez-faire principle.