EssaysForStudent.com - Free Essays, Term Papers & Book Notes
Search

Nimmo Receptor-Tonus Method Vs. Sacro-Occipital Technique

By:   •  Essay  •  292 Words  •  February 28, 2010  •  1,092 Views

Page 1 of 2

Join now to read essay Nimmo Receptor-Tonus Method Vs. Sacro-Occipital Technique

Nimmo Receptor-Tonus Method vs. Sacro-Occipital Technique

When examining and researching the techniques and methods behind both Nimo Receptor-Tonus Method vs. Sacro-Occipital Technique, I found many likes and differences. Although they are two entirely different techniques, they both are formatted to treat subluxation in the spinal column and were started and theorized to reduce pain and increase comfort levels. The Nimmo Receptor-Tonus Method entails Trigger Point Therapy and is used mostly in the soft tissues; whereas, Sacro-Occipital Techniques are used at the ends of the spinal column targeting cerebrospinal fluid build-ups and ultimately trying to decrease and eliminate the build-up. Overall, both techniques are successful and are used everyday for different types of back pain.

Nimmo Receptor-Tonus Method (NRTM) was theorized in the 1950s by Raymond L. Nimmo, D.C. He was not happy with the results he was getting from the original chiropractic methods of manipulation, and decided to think outside the feild of his prior research and studying. At first his methods were not popular

Download as (for upgraded members)  txt (1.8 Kb)   pdf (47.6 Kb)   docx (10.4 Kb)  
Continue for 1 more page »