The Foundations of Henri Fayol's Administrative
By: Jessica • Research Paper • 426 Words • November 19, 2009 • 1,507 Views
Essay title: The Foundations of Henri Fayol's Administrative
The foundations of Henri Fayol’s administrative
theory
Daniel A. Wren
David Ross Boyd Professor Emeritus and Curator, Harry W. Bass Business History
Collection, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma, USA
Arthur G. Bedeian
Boyd Professor, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA
John D. Breeze
Independent Scholar and Business Owner/Manager, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
As management historians, we are seldom
able to trace the formative thinking of our
field’s major contributors, especially its
founders. McMahon and Carr (1999, p. 228)
noted the ''increasing distance between
students and scholars of today and the early
writers in the development of management
thought . . . The current generation of
students are reading less of the actual
writings of the early scholars and more what
those writing current texts are attributing to
[them].’’ At best, by examining contemporary
accounts, or in the limited instances where
autobiographies exist, we can attempt to
discern the incipient antecedents and
inchoate reasoning giving rise to the later
development of more polished thoughts
(Bedeian, 1992; Carson and Carson, 1998). In
this way, we may strive to gain a more
complete understanding of our own
intellectual heritage as it has been shaped by
the experiences, reflections, and study of
those who have gone before us, as well as
continue to learn from the past as it informs
the present (Bedeian, 1998).
There are precedents that indicate how the
discovery, translation, and/or reprinting of
early writings have informed the present. We
would still be in the dark about what really
happened at the Hawthorne Plant of Western
Electric without the seminal works of Wrege
(1961) and Greenwood et al. (1983). Max
Weber’s (1922) turgid Wirtschaft und
Gesellschaft was published posthumously and
did not reach an English-reading audience
until Gerth and Wright Mills’ translation of
Weber’s theory of bureaucracy (Weber, 1946)
and later, Henderson